Prospect Theory and the Brain
نویسندگان
چکیده
Whether we like it or not we face risk every day of our lives. From selecting a route home from work to selecting a mate, we rarely know in advance and with certainty what the outcome of our decisions will be. Thus, we are forced to make tradeoffs between the attractiveness (or unattractiveness) of potential outcomes and their likelihood of occurrence. The lay conception of risk is associated with hazards that fill one with dread or are poorly understood (Slovic, 1987). Business managers, for example, tend to see risk not as a gamble but as a “challenge to be overcome” and see risk as increasing with the magnitude of potential losses (e.g., March and Shapira, 1987). Likewise, medical clinicians tend to see risk as exposure to loss or harm to oneself or others (Furby and Beyth-Marom, 1992). Decision theorists, in contrast, view risk as increasing with variance in the probability distribution of possible outcomes, regardless of whether a potential loss is involved. For example, a prospect that offers a 50 50 chance of paying $100 or nothing is more risky than a prospect that offers $50 for sure even though the risky prospect entails no possibility of losing money. This core idea serves as the focus of discussion in Chapter 9, which discusses the many approaches to risk in the study of human and animal preferences. Since the work of the American economist Frank Knight (1921), however, economists have distinguished decisions under risk from decisions under uncertainty. In decisions under risk, the decision maker knows with precision the probability distribution of possible outcomes, as when betting on the flip of a coin or entering a lottery with a known number of tickets. In decisions under uncertainty the decision maker is not provided such information but must assess the probabilities of potential outcomes with some degree of vagueness, as when betting on a victory by the home team or investing in the stock market. This distinction between risk and uncertainty is also developed at greater length in Chapter 9.
منابع مشابه
An extended hesitant group decision-making technique based on the prospect theory for emergency situations
Throughout the present manuscript, we are going to introduce a novel group emergency decision-making technique in which the application of prospect theory explains the psychological behaviour of the decision maker who is affected by the hesitancy and uncertainty of cognition in decision making problems.\Instead of usual aggregation procedure, we implement here a new fusion technique that ...
متن کاملExplaining Heterogeneity in Risk Preferences Using a Finite Mixture Model
This paper studies the effect of the space (distance) between lotteries' outcomes on risk-taking behavior and the shape of estimated utility and probability weighting functions. Previously investigated experimental data shows a significant space effect in the gain domain. As compared to low spaced lotteries, high spaced lotteries are associated with higher risk aversion for high probabilities o...
متن کاملProspect theory on the brain? Toward a cognitive neuroscience of decision under risk.
Most decisions must be made without advance knowledge of their consequences. Economists and psychologists have devoted much attention to modeling decisions made under conditions of risk in which options can be characterized by a known probability distribution over possible outcomes. The descriptive shortcomings of classical economic models motivated the development of prospect theory (D. Kahnem...
متن کاملEffect of Cognitive Biases on Rationality of Economic Decision Making under Risk among Students of Shahid Beheshti University
The purpose of this study is to determine the quality of individual economic decision making under risk and uncertainty. The research method is a quasi-experiment with single group and a post-test. The total population of the students of Shahid Beheshti University in 97 was 8.700 and due to non-normal distribution, we should use non-parametric Wilcoxon test, with sample of 180. The tool used to...
متن کاملSyntactic Development of Right-Brain and Left-Brain Dominant Iranian EFL Learners: Processability Theory in Perspective
Processability Theory, a component of the cognitive approach to second language acquisition tries to enhance understanding of how the interlanguage knowledge systems can be restructured by second language learners (Pienemann, 1998, 2015). The present study intended to run a similar investigation into the syntactic development of Right-Brain and Left-Brain Dominant Iranian EFL learners based on ...
متن کاملProspect of Emission Reduction Standard for Sustainable Port Equipment Electrification
Despite efficient carbon monitoring system and the commercialization of battery technology for intra-port transportation, port management are found not adopting these environmental yet costly equipments. Port authority who regulates environmental policies lacks leverage to impose tangible reduction on emission through concession. This model integrates sustainability into port equipment expansio...
متن کامل